Before the development of economic science, people thought of exchange and the market as always benefiting one party at the expense of the other. This was the root of the mercantilist view of the market. Economics has shown that this is a fallacy, for on the [free] market both parties to any exchange benefit. On the market, therefore, there can be no such thing as exploitation. But the thesis of a conflict of interest is true whenever the State or any other agency intervenes on the market. For then the intervener gains only at the expense of subjects who lose in utility. On the market all is harmony. But as soon as intervention appears and is established, conflict is created, for each may participate in a scramble to be a net gainer rather than a net loser—to be part of the invading team, instead of one of the victims.
— Murray Rothbard, Power & Market
Notes:
-
vivaorock reblogged this from laliberty
-
michaelangerlo reblogged this from laliberty
-
fullcapitalism reblogged this from laliberty
-
nariaalexandria reblogged this from bmrgould
-
fittingcrime reblogged this from laliberty
-
anarcho-alowisney likes this
-
peachesandpumpkins likes this
-
unapologeticallylibertarian reblogged this from anarchei
-
bootyregrit likes this
-
munkiepoo likes this
-
bmrgould reblogged this from anarchei
-
bmrgould likes this
-
anarchei reblogged this from laliberty
-
gavinvz likes this
-
dropthepress likes this
-
whakahekeheke likes this
-
sashutka1 likes this
-
lendahandandliftme reblogged this from laliberty
-
michaelangerlo likes this
-
phil0kalia likes this
-
unusualtragicandalive likes this
-
unusualtragicandalive reblogged this from laliberty
-
threestarsmash likes this
-
anthraxenchiladas reblogged this from laliberty
-
anthraxenchiladas likes this
-
anarchei likes this
-
dudeistlibertarian likes this
-
laliberty posted this