We must always remember what all politicians are: mafia bosses. Even the great Ron Paul still gets a paycheck that is derived from the theft of the masses. I support Ron because of his incredible unwavering support of the non-aggression principle, but he is by far the exception to the rule. As much as I love Ron, I’m not going to blindly approve of actions he might take that violate what I know to be true and just. If Ron Paul did something “bad”, I would be among the first to denounce him. In this case, Rand’s endorsement of Romney is inexcusable given the fact that his father is still technically running and Gary Johnson is still in the mix.
(Source: moralanarchism)
Notes:
-
necronaught likes this
-
graceinmyheart likes this
-
iambinarymind reblogged this from laliberty
-
anarcho-alowisney likes this
-
iambinarymind likes this
-
maxlibertarios likes this
-
enemyofthestatist likes this
-
poorrichardsnews likes this
-
thecriticlaughs likes this
-
idontmakemonkeys likes this
-
intheflameoferror said:
Even if what Rand did was intentional in positioning himself, it doesn’t excuse the deed itself. It’s dirty. And to the average person, it looks sketchy. There has to be a better way, one that doesn’t involve playing the establishment’s game.
-
laliberty reblogged this from moralanarchism
-
moralanarchism posted this